User talk:Bbb23
Blocked user Kingcutie under new sockpuppet HDClear
It appears that user Kingcutie is once again vandalizing his brother's wikipedia page under sockpuppet HDClear, for which he was previously banned by you.
It's not entirely clear to me how to proceed with bringing attention to this.
WIKI PAGE: Har Mar Superstar
OLD USER: User:Kingcutie
NEW USER: User talk:HDClear
Now what?
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Draft:Murder of Susana Morales retagged. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Block Fram?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Cringe. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Fram: you are perilously close to a block for edit warring. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- There are some really bad BLPvios there, as well as some significant BLPCRIME issues. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's how I read it. So, where do we go from here? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- WP:BLPN? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's how I read it. So, where do we go from here? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I would delete it as an attack page just based on the infobox listing a victim with no conviction, saying he had stalked a woman in wiki-voice, the false charges in wiki-voice. It's TNT level shit. Voice of Clam, what did you see that looked like this should exist? It's not a public figure, and there's no conviction. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- There are some really bad BLPvios there, as well as some significant BLPCRIME issues. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Fram: you are perilously close to a block for edit warring. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Cringe. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Blocking me for edit warring would be an abuse of the admin tools. 3RR exemptions (and I'm not at 3RR anyway), "Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced according to Wikipedia's biographies of living persons (BLP) policy. What counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial. Consider reporting to the BLP noticeboard instead of relying on this exemption.". No idea why BBB23 has no issue reinstating BLP violations and considers blocking the one that removes them, or how none of you seems to have any idea how to deal with things like this. Fram (talk) 15:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Fram: Disruptive editing by reapplying a declined speedy deletion tag is not the answer. What about WP:AFD? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- WP:BLP doesn't wait for AFD.
Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—must be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.
Almost this entire article is a BLPvio. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)- No, declining an A10 speedy without addressing the BLP violations in any way at all is not the answer. Please get your priorities straight and care first about the important issues instead of "oh no, someone reinstated a CSD tag, block them". Do you truly believe someone readding an A10 tag is worse than claiming someone is a murderer without them being convicted? Fram (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- WP:BLP doesn't wait for AFD.
- (edit conflict) You're a good editor and one with whom I agree frequently. That said, you can be extraordinarily willful and edit Wikipedia as if you are the supreme commander of policy and what should and shouldn't be done. I reverted you simply because of the policy against retagging once a speedy has been declined. I'm bowing out of this and let other administrators more masochistic than I deal with you and "it".--Bbb23 (talk) 15:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- WP:AFD is the way to go on a declined CSD. But, I too lack sufficient masochism for this level of drama. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I G10'd it, as the entire article was essentially about a non-public figure accused of a crime with accusations represented as fact in wiki-voice. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- WP:AFD is the way to go on a declined CSD. But, I too lack sufficient masochism for this level of drama. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Voice of Clam (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.
Technical news
- The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
- The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.
Miscellaneous
- WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!
This user is blocked as a sock of User:Swagotalaxmi Deb but cannot locate the actual SPI. Came here since you were the blocking admin. There is now user User:শ্রীমদ্ভগবদগীতা who has picked up where the other has left off. CNMall41 (talk) 16:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my talk page message
Yeah, what the title says.
Appreciate it too...I don't think the user knows how to properly send warnings to other users on Wikipedia. GoodHue291 (talk) 19:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Reporting a User
Hey, i would like to bring to your attention the Yupsguts, the user is the suspected sockpuppet of Jha09 (talk+ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser). Take a look at the user contributions, the user is creating article Shehzad Sheikh, the lead actor of the show Mehndi Wala Ghar, which is deleted again and again due to sockpuppet creation and activity by Jha09. Also the user is editing Pandya Store , which was one of the main target pages of Jha09. Please take the required action. Imsaneikigai (talk) 20:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Jha09 has a huge number of deleted edits, and I haven't been able to find the Sheikh page that has been "deleted again and again". Do you have a link to it?--Bbb23 (talk) 20:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oh my bad, i meant Mehndi Wala Ghar article which was deleted again and again due to sockpuppets of Jha09 and this draft Draft:Shehzad Sheikh (Indian actor) is of the actor in the series which Yupsguts is drafting. Imsaneikigai (talk) 20:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Socks
You think 69.77.153.166 (talk · contribs) fits for WP:LOUTSOCK for LandenKarlM4 (talk · contribs)? Q T C 13:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- In this instance, the inverse, block evasion, and I've blocked them for 3 months.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Crystal RP
Hi, on the off chance that you hadn't already noticed, User:Akalowtrippy and Apathetic132 are posting the same attack pages about someone who runs a games server, with accompanying doxing info. Thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 16:12, 6 June 2024 (UTC)